Police Brutality: Maryland Student Beaten, Cops Cover Up!

RAW, ZOOMED & SLOW MOTION - Two police officers in Prince George's County, MD, face disciplinary action following a probe into allegations of police brutality. "He doesn't say a word to the officers, they don't give him any orders," said attorney Christopher Griffiths, "and you can see what they do." Griffiths claimed his client, University of Maryland student John McKenna, 22, was beaten by officers following a men's basketball game between Duke and Maryland on March 3. Thousands of students poured into the streets in College Park to celebrate Maryland's victory. Some set fires, and police were called in to restore order. Twenty-three students, including McKenna and 20-year-old Ben Donat, were arrested. McKenna and Donat were charged with assaulting mounted officers, but video tells a different story. "The charging documents are a complete fabrication," Griffiths said. "And they're fabricated for a specific purpose. They're fabricated to cover up the police misconduct." Those charges have now been dropped. The Prince George's County's police chief initially defended his officer's handling of the melee, but has changed his tune. "I saw the tape. I am outraged. I'm disappointed," said Chief Roberto Hylton. Hylton said one of the officers has been identified and will be immediately suspended. He said they're in the process of identifying the other officer, and plan to do an internal review. The US Department of Justice could also get involved. The Prince George's County ...



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TiEDD58zpJw&hl=en

My Links : discount carseats princess cruise ships asbestos settlement

14 Year Old's Tips For Preventing Child Sexual Assault

As a mother, I can't tell you the guilt and pain that goes along with the disclosure of sexual assault. It's been a year and I'm still "stuck in time" not able to move forward as we battle our court systems that I assumed would help us. Unfortunately, I am told that only 1 in 16 perpetrators ever get to court for these cases and of those only 6% will ever spend time in jail. How is a person to heal from such a personal assault when the courts don't support the laws they write? As I struggle to move on with life and understanding of such unexplainable victimization, my daughter has found the strength and ability to do so. Maybe, one day I will have her strength and courage. Until then, here is her story and her desire to help others avoid a situation that affect her for the rest of her life.

I am 14 and this is my story -

My name is Tivona. I'm not a famous author, model, or actor. I'm not Super Girl trying to save the world or a Super Villain trying to destroy it. I'm not anyone special except to my family. I'm just an ordinary, fun loving, moody teenager. I'm just trying to grow up and live an average life like everyone else. I'm 14 and looking forward to high school.

Yet, there are days that I wake up and feel like I can't relate to anyone else in the world. I want to be a ghost and disappear...There are days I wish I weren't here. During the day, I maintain A's in school, I sing, draw in my journal, hang out online with my friends, play the saxophone, am an avid hunter and am a half back on my soccer team. Yet at night, when I crawl into my warm bed - surrounded by my soft blankets, my cats and more stuffed animals than you can count, I feel so alone. So isolated. Like no one else in the world knows how I'm feeling. It's at this time, that I have to deal with my own private monsters and demons.

In the dark, I feel like no one could understand me. I'm not worried about the typical teenage stuff because my life over the last 4 years hasn't been really ordinary. It's been conventional on the outside while pain and guilt raged on the inside. Quietly, I've suffered. How could I tell anyone that I was a victim of sexual assault? Who could I tell and who would believe me?

As the daughter of someone in law enforcement and the niece of an attorney, I have always been told, and led to believe, that if you do something wrong - you are punished. There are consequences for your behavior. Today, as I write you my story of sexual abuse at the hands of a loved one, my abuser is free to roam the streets of our town because the Prosecuting Attorney refuses to follow up on my claims of abuse

I know it is hard to listen to these accusations. I know it is hard to comprehend that "this" person can do "these" things but there is a "silent epidemic" occurring in this country and it is harming those of us you have "sworn" to protect! Please take a minute to listen to our "cries for help". They are not false or "made up". They are very real. In some of our lives, there are truly monsters who hide "under our beds" and "in our closets" at night just waiting for the darkness so they can "attack". We rely on you to help and we need you NOW more than ever!

I truly believe that society has the resources to put an end to this epidemic. At the very least, we can drastically reduce it. Why don't we? Are we too afraid it can happen in our own homes and that's scarier to acknowledge than believing it is the "horrible monster we see on Law and Order" that is causing this destruction? Perhaps you misread the statistics?

Talking about sexual abuse of children is crossing into frightening, unfamiliar territory for many people. We live in a very confusing society with hypocritical views on sex and sexuality. We are uncomfortable talking about sex, but we are willing to have it sold to us through songs, magazines, TV and advertisements.

I know that healing is a process, a journey. I know I will never forget the assaults and abuse but I hope to grow from this experience and I want to help others "escape" and grow too. PLEASE JOIN ME AND USE YOUR VOICE TO HELP STOP THIS CYCLE OF VIOLENCE IN OUR COUNTRY.

Child sexual assault is the world's deepest, darkest, best kept secret. How many are out there, I guess we will truly never know. I am asking, pleading with you to take a stand. Remind all those who choose to seek out the children, that their behavior will not be tolerated no matter who they are. I believe I did the right thing by finally "telling". I truly hope that my openness can save other children. I told the police. I was open and honest, even though it was extremely embarrassing to retell my story to one stranger after another. I believed in the process of the justice system. All I am asking is that the justice system "believes in me too!"

Here's my story, it began in 1994:

People talk about "Princesses". Royalty really isn't my thing - I enjoy the "supernatural" - vampires really. Nevertheless, for years, I was truly a "Princess" in my family. The "first born" for both sides of extended family, I entered this world in grand fashion (an emergency C-section because I had stopped breathing). For my loved ones, I truly was a miracle and blessing. I grew and thrived from the attention and you can truly say "I was rotten". So many camera flashes have gone off in my face over the years it's amazing I am not blind. As an avid hunter, my grandfather had me appreciating nature as soon as I could walk and follow in his footsteps. Even my name, Tivona, means a "love for the outdoors. This man was my "hero".

My perfect, innocent "happily-ever-after-fairytale-princess" life and childhood began to crumble and ended when I was 10. That was the year my grandfather died. That was the year that my whole world began to shatter into small pieces and fall apart around me. It was at that time, my uncle would also begin to "groom" me for his own sexual pleasures and means of "control". It began with slow rubs and touches and progressed from there.

During this time, my uncle gradually eroded our appropriate adult / child boundaries, built a wall of secrecy around us and finally established compliance through my fear. Over the next 3 years, I was repeatedly reminded that this was "our little secret" and I mustn't say a thing. He told me that I would be to blame if anyone discovered our secret little game. He repeatedly told me that: "This would really hurt my mom if she knew" and that he would go to jail if I told. Each time he said that, a part of me died. I betrayed what I knew was the "right thing to do" because I was afraid "no one would believe me" and because I didn't want my close knit family to fall apart. It just seemed easier to close my eyes, retreat to the darkness in my head and "go along" than upset anyone. My life became a fraud and a fiction. Do you know how much energy is consumed to keep a secret hidden from ourselves and our families?

As a family member, he had seduced us all. He had our devotion and love. He was trustworthy and "above reproach". His popularity within our family covered behaviors that should never have been tolerated. He was a trusted friend and relative; a pillar of the community. He would never do anything "shady" or inappropriate. That is what he hoped everyone would believe if I ever told our "secret".

By creating an untarnished image, he has convinced my beloved aunt and his children that he is innocent and that I am lying and trying to destroy his pristine image in our lives and our community. He has 'explained away' most of his actions with excuses. When approached with his inappropriate behaviors, he responded by being insulted and became extremely defensive. Although never acknowledging the abuse, he never once denied it either. His response to the police, and I quote, "if that's what she said happened, then it must have happened...I just don't remember".

During my short time in therapy, I have learned that pedophiles are like any other predator. They stalk and hunt children as their prey. Many predators, like mine, will spend weeks, months, and even years grooming their victims. They are calculating, manipulative, and very, very patient when it comes to achieving their goal. Molesters are charming. They get along with everyone and are usually popular. They can be upstanding members of the community and tend to present a perfect image. Like my uncle, they are "great guys" and "everybody's friend". They are charming and intimidate other adults into believing they are above reproach. Their behavior is a controlled public image - for I know all too well about their private behaviors. My counselor says she has never met a "child molester she didn't like".

Today, I wonder if he is capable of feeling, let alone harbors a conscience. And did he, in all those years of wonderful memories, ever really love me? Is he sorry for the destruction he has caused in all of our lives, even though he refuses to admit it? I'd like to know WHY? Why did he chose to cross that line of trust? And HOW? How could he show up year and year, event after event? Just pretending, never showing how he was hurting me and how he had hurt my aunt and his granddaughter before me (those who chose to harbor that pain internally for years until I told)? How could he torcher us all like that with his "games"? Yes, I know I will never get the answers that I want or deserve but I continue to silently wonder....

Like any other addict, when asked, he creates excuses for all around him to explain his behavior and he has placed the blame for his behavior solely on me (just like he said he would). He has made me lose faith in myself, all in an attempt to control me. There are mornings when I wake up that I don't recognize the "girl in the mirror". I feel as if my spirit has been surgically extracted.

There are days I act like a wounded animal: crying, attacking, and retreating. I am working to understand this is not my fault. I ask for reassurance that my perpetrator was a liar when he said that I had control and could stop it anytime. I agonize over the line of appropriate touch at the same time my hormones are throwing me into that "time of my life". I am filled with confusion, anger and premature sexualization at a time when I'm already battling those issues. Talk about the "straw that could break the camel's back". I struggle with the fact that my uncle made me feel as an accomplice in this whole lie.

The pain is similar to jumping out of an airplane without a parachute. I mourn the loss of my relationship with my Aunt. I have bad dreams; break into tears for no reason and battle anger - at my perpetrator and my extended family for letting this happen to me. I can say: I take it day by day. Sometimes minute by minute. Sometimes I have to remember to breathe.

I want consequences for my uncle's behavior.

Today, the reports have been filed, the secrets are out. So how can he be free to just roam about? Don't I have the right to be Safe, Strong and Free? (Don't so many other victims have that same right?) The prosecuting attorney refuses to file charges because there were no witnesses and they can't see my broken heart and sole. It's his word against mine. Without formal charges, his name will NEVER be on a sexual predator list, many others aren't either because only 1 in 16 perps are actually prosecuted if you can believe that or not!! And only 6% of those people will ever spend time in jail! Are your kids safe?

There has been no justice. Even after justice is served, this case will be over for those of you reading and those who have worked on my case, but for me and my family, this is still just the beginning - a new beginning I hope but a part of our lives we will never forget.

My advice to you? Educate your children. Set "rules". We like rules and it's easier to tell when a rule has been broken. Teach your children age appropriate information about their bodies. Tell them it is okay to say "NO". And, that it's okay to break a promise they might make about sexual abuse. Teach your children that a person who sexually abuses a child can be anyone and that they need to tell even when the offender is someone they like, love or even live with. Finally, let your child know that if sexual abuse happens to them, they are still a good person, they are still lovable and they you believe them and will love them no matter what!

Instead of just responding to the aftermath of abuse, why not focus on prevention? This is a widespread illness that requires new attitudes and change - I know that first hand from my own experiences. Child sexual abuse is an adult problem - the responsibility shouldn't all be placed on us as children. Sometimes, even if we know it's "okay and right" to tell, it is still hard for us to do. Please watch out for us...look for the signs and report them...

Our journey is still underway but if the ground I've already covered can benefit someone else, then I am doubly blessed.

Related : dvd monitor headrest carmonitors carseats early childhood curriculum franchise training cheap auto insurance quote

America's Next Top Model Designer Charged With Sexual Assault

Last week, fashion designer Anand Jon was charged with six felonies by the Los Angeles County District Attorney's office. He faces complaints regarding vulgar acts on a minor and rape of multiple victims he allegedly committed between October 2004 and March 5, 2007.

Jon, a 33-year old Indian-born fashion designer, has made numerous appearances on the reality show America's Next Top Model. Known for embracing modern technology in his designs, he has uniquely established himself as a much-admired designer to a number of celebrities and infamous icons like Paris Hilton, Princess Olivia de Burbon, Gloria Estefan, Alanis Morissette, Janet Jackson, Mary J Blige, Michelle Rodriguez, Tara Reid and The Al Saud Royal Family just to name a few.

His frequent participation on the show America's Next Top Model has added positive exposure to the well-established designer. However with the charges he is currently faced with, no amount of America's Next Top Model publicity can absolve him from the noise surrounding his accusations. If proven guilty, Jon could be convicted for life. His bail has been fixed at $1.3 million.

In addition, sexual charges are not the only buzzing news following fashion designer. Apparently, his eligibility to work in the United States is also in question. Even though his lawyer maintains that he came to the US with a professional work visa, people from Immigration have already included Jon in their watch list.

And despite the formal complaint against him, he remains firm with his denial, asserting his firm respect for women. In fact, his attorney explained that Jon is in a difficult position having been surrounded by numerous women who aspires to make it big in the industry. He also stresses the high probability of these women making "false allegations" against his client. His first court date is scheduled on April 4, 2007.

Recommend : caraudiomonitor. headrest carmonitors franchise kfc carribean cruise

Assault Weapons Ban 2.0

While I have been and remain as such, a supporter of President Obama, it cannot be said that the charming deviant agrees all of the administrations proposed policies. One policy with which I find myself in total disagreement with is the reinstating of the Assault weapons ban (1994, not 84 as I misquoted in the vid). There has also been talk of a more expansive ban on all semi-automatic weapons in the civilian gun market. The original law was deeply flawed in its premise, its vague definition of what specifically constituted an "Assault Weapon" (aside from menacing looks), and in its arbitrary parameters. Some of the prohibited weapon features are listed below: Semi-automatic rifles able to accept detachable magazines and two or more of the following were prohibited: - Folding or telescoping stock - Pistol grip - Bayonet mount - Flash suppressor, or threaded barrel designed to accommodate one - Grenade launcher (more precisely, a muzzle device which enables the launching or firing of rifle grenades) Semi-automatic pistols with detachable magazines and two or more of the following: - Magazine that attaches outside the pistol grip - Threaded barrel to attach barrel extender, flash suppressor, handgrip, or suppressor - Barrel shroud that can be used as a hand-hold - Unloaded weight of 50 oz (1.4 kg) or more - A semi-automatic version of an automatic firearm Semi-automatic shotguns with two or more of the following: - Folding or telescoping stock - Pistol grip - Fixed capacity ...



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Ptqm6nkO4A&hl=en

Thanks To : caraudiomonitor. headrest dvd monitor cheap auto insurance quote asbestos lawyers license school

Phoenix Wrong: Machinima Attorney (REUPLOADED)

Yes, I want this to increase the sound reupload. So yes, enjoy the video ... again. ________________________________________ This is my second Phoenix Wrong video and Sprite. This video has the audio sources from the machinima. I wanted this before the start of the third chapter makes the Assault of the Assassin, but that this has taken so long. They are the machinimator kill me when they see it, when I their audio sources. I do not know a machinima that everything is funnyepic or random, I actually more Super Mario 64 and Super Smash Bros. Machinima am fan. Yes, I'm not depressed now you do not take care of it. Audio sources: 1 Reason To Go - 2nd Brawlgasm Marth's XXX Chat Line - Peach's Slutty Adventures 3rd How to Defeat Killa7 - Smashtasm 4th Discussion with the Leader Cosby - Freddy Dee and fifth Language - Red vs. Blue 6 It's just a movie - Revelation Extra 7th A spam-bot - Smashtasm 8th "My real name is Duncan, and my friends call me Duncan - Peach'sSlutty Adventure 9th "I'm Black" - Beans 10th Meet gyrus - No More Gears 11th Mario's First Time - Extra revelation 12th "We Will Fuck You" - beans Ending Song: "Let's Brawl (SSBB Remix)" by Tonindo Note: I am the owner of the audio sources, they are among the machinima that own machinimator. Brawlgasm was made by Guitarmasterx7 was made Peach's Slutty Adventures by Dexterboy124, was established by Smashtasm Shippiddge, Freddy and Dee also made by Dexterboy124, Red VS. Blue was made (I can not...



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PmdvTI0Lnzc&hl=en

Related : car tv monito acne skincare merchant accounts credit card

Criminal Defense Attorney - Things to Look For When Hiring One

Hiring a criminal defense one is something that most people hope never do to have them, but should be in such a situation it is crucial to the event you choose someone who has the appropriate qualifications and experience to best serve and you. This could be the difference between losing and winning a case that can be a lot of money or even a prison sentence. For this reason, it is essential that the following factors before weighing a decisionIf you are not already a law on the holder. First of all, to choose someone that you be honest and feel comfortable discussing with potentially sensitive issues.

The first and perhaps most important thing to look at law in hiring a criminal defense is their specific experience with your type of case. Be sure to ask about their experiences courtroom, and the type of training they received that they would qualify for the processing of your case.Many lawyers specialize in one type of case, so finding the right fit. You should be able seem ready, and explain the court process to you in a way that makes sense, so that you feel able and ready.

While they may have had the experience of past years have sure, in that your potential criminal defender also has specific experience in the courtroom before a jury. Even if you hope to reach a plea bargain or dismissal before the caseeven end up in a court if it comes, you have a solid professional who is able, the facts are in your favor today. To this end, they should also be familiar with local judges and prosecutors who will be handling your case for clear and relevant discussion of the issues at hand.

Of course you can also play an important role in budget as in the selection of the best criminal defense, so the test is a final. In a meeting with variousAttorneys for the advice and discussion of your case, all fees, which may come with such processes such as forensics or legal assistant work, may wonder at first hidden. Not exclude the possibility of a solicitor instructed you to court, you should not by your own make at this time. All these are just some of the things to keep in mind while searching for the best fit for your case.

My Links : carmonitor lcd car monitor christmas quotes theft attorney

Troy Police and Attorney John Makris Corruption Exposed

Witness her fiance Troy lawyer John Makris Ms. P attack shows how lawyer John Makris, Troy, police officers and City Attorney intimidated and harassed them try it their history that they do not see, Troy Attorney John Makris change attack and her fiance, such as lawyer John Makris, Troy Police and City Attorney then tried to cover up their misconduct.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FjmlheywGjk&hl=en

Related : carmonitor lcd carmonitors discount carseats crime lawyer consolidation loan refinance student

Different Types of Background Checks

Check for someone has been a part of our daily life, especially when we barely know the person. There are masses of reasons why a person controls lead to other, it may be because some of the security is their security, such as in banks, in an airplane, a person in need of a kindergarten specialist, a parent in need a Nanny is a landlord in the hunt for a good tenant and many more.

A background check is a procedure done to examine public records, financial records and transactionsRecords of a particular person. This occurs when a person applies for a job. This is to ensure that person is trustworthy, no criminal background and credibility. It is usually done by the police, but by the development of technology, there are certain companies that offer background checks for employers on the Internet.

There are different types of background checks and here are some ways to get information: first, the work references, it checks the records from previous employers. Second, educationCheck receive these checks grades and other qualifications. Thirdly, identity and address verification This is to ensure that there is no identity theft and the applicant, he / she is real. Fourth, credit history checks this, if an applicant recent bankruptcies. Fifthly, the driving and vehicle records, they must be submitted for driver applicants, this is to check if there are no history of accidents and traffic tickets. Sixth, criminal history report, these controlsif an applicant has criminal past. Drug tests are required for applicants, and some interviews as well.

But some background checks have their limitations, because certain laws. These laws prohibit sometimes the employer to personal information about credit and debt check. Medical records are sometimes prohibited because they considered confidential.

Background Checks are normal for candidates. This is done to assess the skills and the credibility of job seekers.This is also done to the employer, that their future employees are credible, trustworthy and safe, become a major asset of the company.

Visit : car monitor domainname back acne treatment md skin zune 30gb

Dogs - Friendly Domestic Companions Or Furry Time Bombs?

People have lived with dogs since the beginning of time. Recent archaeological evidence estimates that 30,000 years, humans and canines, the bond that would last up to the present developed, socializing with dogs, protection and transportation to offer our earliest ancestors.

As civilization developed in its current iteration, "the dog as well as develop. given the large, aggressive and powerful early progenitor had the occasion to countless different races of the mantle,Shape and size. Selective breeding enabled people to increase or to decrease required the trains to create, types of dog that may have never existed in the wild, and to find them better suited to the urban environment, inhabiting that more and more people own.

One aspect of the nature of a dog that no amount could eliminate the selective reproduction or genetic profiles completely the fundamental nature of the dog is aggressive. Although there are certain breeds that are more likely to havethese primitive tendencies, is the heart of any modern His dog react to certain situations, the same reactions as their ancestors.

In most probability, that a common ancestor that all dogs share the wolf. It is not the dog fault that it can be aggressive, vicious and territorial, in the tiny frame of the most delicate and docile Chihuahua Golden Retriever the heart of one of the most impressively powerful top predators suggests shock in the wild. Although centuriesBreeding and years of training can reduce the potential for a particular dog to react violently to a situation when they are pressed, the animal return to its base nature, and will act accordingly.

The important thing for everyone to understand the situation involving a dog attack, that a dog can act according to their nature, it is the duty, is that dog owners take responsibility for their pet measures. We live in a civil society, and decide if the people who have pets, must alsoSelect strain with the reality when their pets in injury or harm to an innocent person can be held liable courts.

Victims of dog bites must also understand that rights to financial compensation for the injuries they suffer because of the actions of the other dogs follow. This compensation can of money for hospital bills and rehabilitation on recovery for pain and suffering caused to extend through a mauling.

Unfortunately, given thedown by a dog bite case often requires dedicated and experienced legal training, as are key variables that can in any situation, which remain unnoticed, or worse, compromised, by someone who does not have a background in litigation.

Armed with a little knowledge of dog bites and their consequences, you can make an informed decision if you or someone you love and the sacrifice of such a brutal assault heartbreaking.

Recommend : monitor car monitor student debt consolidation

Jorge L Colon Ocala FL

Colon Jorge L www.localedge.com criminal law, wrongful death, personal injury, criminal, legal, family, family, immigration, probation, divorce, misdemeanor attorneys, lawyer, felony, dui, worker compensation law, capital crimes, family law, domestic violence, violations of worker's compensation, crime, lawyer, DUI, dui, lawyer, capital offenses, custody, probation, criminal, accident, divorce, lawyer, child custody, personal injury, misdemeanors



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7mJYgjlZ6I4&hl=en

Recommend : dvd monitor carseats dwi texas Holland america cruise asbestos claims

Getting Help With a Driving While Intoxicated Arrest - What You Need to Know

If you have been recently arrested for driving while intoxicated, you probably do not know what should be your next step. Undoubtedly the most important thing you can do, drink-driving defense lawyer contact. These lawyers specialize in defending DUI / DWI charges. But more importantly, they can help you make sense of this process confusing and frustrating.

So your first step is to Minneapolis, MN lawyers, the drink-driving charges and Focus Contactthe defense of these charges. Unlike other criminal defense drunk driving defense lawyers have extensive experience and training to organizations and groups have had to drink driving.

These contacts and opportunities to help attorneys improve their skills and improve result, current with new technologies to DUI charges challenges and provide a forum for discussion with other DUI attorneys have knowledge and successful strategies.

First, the MinneapolisMN lawyers explain drink-driving and fees, as the prosecution might affect you.

In fact, there are actually two cases that you are contending with - a criminal DUI charge for the actual and an administrative case, that suspend or revoke your driver's license is used. Drunk Driving criminal defense lawyers take the time to explain the entire process from beginning to theirs. They will also inform you about the possible jail sentence, fines and other consequencesin conjunction with each individual case.

Continue to keep your drunk driving defense lawyers get ready for court. Your Minneapolis MN lawyers reviewed the arrest procedures, evidence at the time of the arrest made your, and gather any other information that may be important for the defense of the charges. This stage is one of the most important parts of your defense.

An experienced lawyer can examine the state information, or search for possible constitutional violationsother problems and weaknesses. Such an attorney can also apply to a team of experts who gathered in a position, the test result or other evidence at the time of your ride while intoxicated arrest challenge can induce.

Finally, your drunk driving defense lawyers are to assist you in the next phase of the process - the preparation of pre-trial motions and hearings, demanding evidence and / or your right to a trial or a quest for the best possible plea bargain.

If a plea bargain is the routeYou and your lawyer should seek ultimately, your Minneapolis MN lawyers seek time reduction of fees, fines and imprisonment. Their advice can help you predict what you should expect at each stage of the process, and they will work aggressively to you, what strategy is ultimately employed to defend.

Although it is never a guarantee when it comes to the defense of the trip comes as intoxicated, you can be sure that your Minneapolis MN lawyers are working to protectTheir interests and get the best result possible. Drunk Driving defense lawyers want to help, if the stressful experience into something that is manageable and perhaps even positive.

Their arrest is not submitted needed an event that always Harms you or your family. the help of your lawyer, you can use this barrier face and begin to move forward with.

My Links : car tv monito mesothelioma law firm mesothelioma prognosis franchise training

Tougher Laws Against Gangs

Gangs' existence dates back to the earlier centuries. Records show that as early as the 1920s had Chicago over 1,000 gangs in existence. Today Los Angeles is known that the gang capital of America with over 120,000 gang members here from the 800,000 gang members of the whole nation. In Maryland, is estimated that 350 gangs operating in the state with a total of 7750 members. majority of the bands (75%) to operate from jail, recruiting new persons convicted forProtection.

With the high numbers, signed Maryland State Maryland's Gang penalties and it was implemented in 2007. Two years had passed and prosecutors are now rallying to get it rewritten correctly. According to Attorney Joseph I. Cassilly, Harford County prosecutor, the law is "watered down" and "useless" because of certain clauses and provisions that have broad meanings. They explained the case, a group of people stabbed, and had a man beaten. Whenthe case appeared on the court and the prosecutors could not prove conspiracy among the defendants, the charges were criminal attack simply left. Several other cases, such as the beating of a Middle School students for the deputy director, shooting on an MTA bus and Inner Harbor, and the murder of a 14-year-old boy from Crofton and a 38-year-old man from Rosedale.

Maryland's top law enforcement officials this week will include AttorneyGeneral Douglas F. Gansler, Corrections Secretary Gary D. Maynard, and Baltimore State's Attorney Patricia C. Jessamy legislature with House Judiciary Committee. She would meet to talk about the laws change and more useful. Some of the provisions that they seek to give a clear sense of the term "gang" and "volume crime". Proceed but also to talk about it, with tougher penalties.

According to them, federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act (RICO)is the model that they prefer. A determination that RICO provides is that U.S. attorneys can gang members for crimes done by their colleagues to follow. U.S. Attorney for Maryland Rod J. Rosenstein together to further that organization RICO makes it a crime only criminals that are part of a .

Many laws are to be protected first and foremost on the existence of the welfare of the citizens. Apart from criminal law to protect yourself, especially your credit card information with Lexington Law. Lexington Legal Informationtells you how much credit you with the right approach. This is only, to show that there are to make the laws for the peace and order, whether from your debts and your overall security.

Thanks To : projection hdtv lcd carmonitor travel cot

Fun-Plex Charges - 11 news reporter Andrea Lucia

We are a teenager, an off duty deputy constable accused of assault, because his pizza was hearing too long. 11 News reporter Andrea Lucia broke the story last month and has more on what the investigation revealed.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A3ORaTKzQfE&hl=en

Recommend : car tv tuner car tv monito carseats mortgage school franchise association royal caribbean cruise line

The US Laws and Defense Criminal Attorney

The word "crime incites" a negative appeal to all. No one wants to stand in such a question that has been demonstrated since once a criminal activity. It is, above all, because your future life will be destroyed, if guilt is proved. Not only will you be terminated from the job, but you can become a case of suspicion in the eyes of society as well. The U.S. laws against such cases are really very strict and the penalties for such crimes is also very difficult.

Accused maylooking for really hard to get fined for the below listed suspect reasons.

The U.S. laws specified crimes are essentially two major categories:

1st Federal Crimes
2nd State Crimes

Federal crimes:

All drug-related crimes as follows:

- Sale of drugs is growing, and distribution of marijuana.
- Medical crime.
- Financial fraud such as credit card numbers, insurance, bankruptcy, and more.
- Immigration and smuggling.

State crime:

- Sales and possession of prohibited drugs.
- Offences relating to theft.
- Crimes done under the influence of alcohol or driving.
- Sex crimes such as prostitution, child abuse etc.
- Violent crime, that can also kidnapping, robbery, assault, bribery, corruption, and more.

Criminal Defense Attorney:

When set in the shackles of an offense against the law, you should receive professional advice and skillful. A professional and experienced criminal defense lawyer> Lawyer can save you problems come from a network. Choose someone who can understand your situation well and gives you a solution that actually works. Consider a person who has a clear understanding and knowledge about the support of all your problems.

Friends Link : caraudiomonitor. domainname projection hdtv md skin drunk driving defense

Secret Trials in the United States

Sunlight is said to be among the best disinfectant, electric light the most efficient policeman.

The U.S. government denies secret study of the practice of foreign-born defendants internationally-mandated rights to a public hearing. But, "[w] e live in dangerous times" is the oft-repeated mantra of governments and officials who have been run successfully the otherwise ordinary civil liberties and rights of citizens and residents of the UnitedStates.

Totalitarian regimes have so historically and currently uses a "need" reasons for the worldwide oppression to justify the millions. In fact, it has the millions of people who have borne the brunt of such atrocities have been on death or concentration camps, gulags and killing fields. Although some might argue that the nature of the terrorist threat to secret trials, the absolute mandate power in the hands of people who are not accountable ultimately undermine public confidence in ourJustice.

As an "indictment" of such unlimited power, only in the last century, millions of citizens worldwide fallen victims of executions, often without the appearance of a fair trial or recognition of their fundamental human rights. The world's governments have repeatedly turned to murder to ethnic, religious and political differences to delete. Just as often blunt, governments have rationalized justice as a tool, without the legitimacy of the evidence - for individuals as aThreat. In addition, an unrestrained government always justify their actions by rally behind the banner of "dangerous times" call for drastic measures.

Should the United States will be a policy of embracing secret procedures, although to (i) hinder international humanitarian law, (ii) appellate court functions, (iii) traditional notions of fairness and (insult iv) of the procedural rules of transparency requires that reasonable studies?

The attacks of 11 September are now part of ournational consciousness. As significant as the Kennedy assassination, these events will not fade from national recognition. We will always know that on 11 September 2001 to celebrate the Al-Qaeda terrorist organization hijacked commercial aircraft used on kamikaze-style attacks on New York City's World Trade Center and the Pentagon. Unfortunately, almost 3,000 people killed in these attacks.

In response to the attacks of 11 September, the Bush administration declared a state of war against terrorism.As part of this response, the United States born in a policy of secret procedures and processes to embrace foreign citizen to prosecute. The reasons given for the existence of these procedures is that these people are suspected of terrorism and the protection of war-time intelligence is justified.

The unprecedented executive order (the "Order") authorizing this practice was executed in November 2001. Actually, U.S. President George Bush's order, in practice and effect waivedcharged with public criminal proceedings for all foreign nationals, the terrorist acts. The Regulation also be waived for public criminal proceedings, all foreigners suspected of terrorism. Instead of following the order of the mandate, they would all these procedures are carried out by a military commission. This specially created commissions missing, but many of the basic protections for fairness in the civil courts and in U.S. military courts set.

In addition, these procedures, for the most part,contrary to the plain language of international human rights treaties. Such long-standing precedents are the root of our due process system, adopted to ensure full transparency of government policy. For his part, should the U.S. government's position - that secret procedure is not a violation of international law - not remain uncontested. As an "advanced society", the U.S. should embrace the dictates of international law and make these criminal litigants a reasonable, fair,and public prosecution process. Finally, these beliefs are subject to reversal by inspection or complaint.

If the position of the government were adopted, it would mean that would be subject for the foreseeable future, no international citizen against the validity of their massive military commission conviction of criminal responsibility, including execution and life imprisonment. Normally a custodial sentence could be carried out by the not the kind in question. InLight of liberty interest at stake and the risk of errors, military commission trials of terrorist suspects should be made public. It is time to reconsider So for the United State to its practices in this area and to change its rule so that they may have allegedly committed acts of terrorism have public trials. Our government should not be allowed to continue a policy of "just trust me" that I am doing what is best for you. This paternalism is contrary to our democratic values andlong-standing demand of the government that the process remains transparent.

This article presents fundamental questions about the power of the United States, the due process rights of international criminal law litigants and purge it goes with the unprecedented judicial concealment of information, a process that currently threatens the public's confidence in the justice system. This article examines the impact of President George Bush's orders, trying to use military commissions of foreign criminalLitigants. Part one of this article examines the procedural framework of the newly created military commissions, and how these processes do not behave with the traditional notions of fairness. Part two of this article turns to the international human rights standards. Specifically, although the current U.S. policy of full secret trials violates the plain language of international human rights treaties, Part Two considers the question of a right states to derogate from their internationalObligations. The third part examines the arguments for secret trials by military Commission. The fourth part deals with the potentially devastating effects of the unilateral U.S. policy regarding Executive consent in military commissions. criss In addressing this framework, several arguments of moral perspectives of international legitimacy of the debate and ultimately lead to the condemnation of secret experiments in the way of military commissions. In addition, part four discusses how nationalSecurity and confidentiality not to the cultural and religious issues in mandates military commissions address. In addition, part four, the harmful aspects of the U.S. attempt to consent to the use of military commissions to the International Criminal Court dispute.

Secret Trials and Secret Evidence

In addition, classified testimony, evidence and information may be used against the accused. "Hearsay will be allowed. Conversations between defendants and lawyersbe observed in some cases. Discharge detection can be kept secret from suspects. "
A commission may admit a wide range of evidence, would be that in criminal trials in federal courts and courts martial to be admissible, as un-affidavits and other hearsay evidence, forced confessions and well-authenticated physical evidence.

are, in fact, not the rules of fair procedure and evidence. As written, the rules allow the Commission Guantánamo federal levelGovernment, Hamdan on the basis of secret evidence that he never see his lawyers and that is to convict never fully understand. Under these rules not only the government to introduce secret evidence in the process, which is withheld from the accused and his civilian lawyers, but the government can blacken "state secrets" given from the evidence the accused's military defense, have the security clearances. In addition to criminal lawyers, the defendantsto refute not recognized or classified to confront statements, evidence and information.

Military jurisdiction of the Commission

be assured, despite the White House that used military commissions to just "try enemy war criminals" for "crimes against the international laws of war," would expand the crimes charged to military jurisdiction into areas never before as the subject of military justice.

The range of crimes, the material is presented as a "triable by military commission" isvery large and includes a rule as a civilian crime crimes. Military Commission Instruction No. 2 extends the concept of "armed conflict" - the state of things, that the threshold is a prerequisite for any offense referred to as a "war crime" - to individual cases, and even tried one crime. Thus, crimes that may traditionally fallen outside the military court now for the purpose of military commissions under which the "laws of the mantle are recordedWar. "

This unprecedented jurisdictional issues can be achieved is by extending the definition of the term "armed conflict" - the Geneva Convention definition, if "the law of war" is triggered - to "hostile acts" or unsuccessful attempts, such acts, including crimes committing to reach isolated as a "terrorist" or "hijacking", which traditionally fall within the ordinary jurisdiction of the federal courts.

The problem with the process because after the 11th September military commissions, then is thatThey provide no mechanism for a defendant who denies his personal jurisdiction of the Commission over him, that the effect of the protest. The President alone determines that an individual subject of the Military Order, and of that determination, the individual may be indicted for war crimes, although he denies that he or an unlawful combatant, he takes on the order of the three criteria for eligibility.

Impartiality of the finder of fact or lack thereof

In addition, there is no jury, withburden on the State to convict only by a two thirds majority vote in the State to rubberstamp met. Of course, the supposed panel, which stamps the U.S. "two-thirds majority burden is allocated from U.S. officers serving in that capacity made.

Secret Proceedings increase the risk of erroneous determinations

The military commission rules on secret evidence can result in a higher risk of incorrect results. The Hamdan court recognized the crucial role that the defendantplays both in the preparation and presentation of the defense. Under the military rules of the Commission, the defendant can from the knowledge and the general nature of the evidence against him to prevent. With the use of military commissions, the risk that the accused mistakenly convicted is much higher. According to her, his hand that secret trials by military commissions are fallible. President Bush's Executive Order makes the military - the establishment of the government is entrusted with the task ofa war against these individuals - the judge, jury and executioner.

With one paw of his pen, replacing President Bush, the democratic foundations of our legal system with the Commission a military system, in which he or his designee, is the rule and coffee maker, investigator, prosecutor, prosecutor, judge, jury, sentencing court, review of court and jailer or executioner. This system is a radical departure from the central constitutional guarantees as the hearts of Americans to beDemocracy: the right to a presumption of innocence, an independent judiciary, jury, unanimous judgments, the public hearing, due process, and appeals to higher courts. All these safeguards against injustice are gone.

It seems unlikely that the Americans would this practice, if President Bush gave this power to enable, for example, the Dallas Police Department. In addition, the order prohibits effect of all right to a meaningful appeal. In the current study the possibility of secret cases,Appeal would be appropriate given the fact that those cases the stigma attached of life imprisonment and death. But now, the result of the Military Commissions is to avoid permanent international criminal defendants all litigants that due process implies.

Even in cases where the sentence - by meeting the load reaches two-thirds majority - is the execution, as the convicted person has no right to a meaningful appeal. The military commissions do not for a review by a court allow independent ofThe executive branch of government. Review of the commissions' procedure is a specially created review panel by the Secretary of Defense appointed limited. No appeal is addressed to U.S. federal courts or allowed the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, a civilian court independent of the executive, the appointments of the court-martial . The President has the final review of the Commission's convictions and sentences.

Everyone convicted of a crime should have the right to use histo review conviction and sentence by a higher tribunal according to law. These criminal parties, but never deny the opportunity to have their debt paid. The right of properly in opposition to the government's effort to secure a person, his liberty is one strip is located in the heart of the procedural law protection under the Constitution. Unfortunately this is not applicable to foreigners accused of committing terrorist acts.

In the absence of a reversal of the position of the United Stateson the implementation of studies mystery, this process threatens the unprecedented judicial concealment of information and practical to allow the power of government can be disabled by the United States. At significant risk for an indefinite period perpetuate such errors as those that may occur, this aspect of the U.S. government deserves the rejection process.

The U.S. arguments for Secret Trials

United States argues that, because terrorists are found worldwide, publicDissemination of classified information would be used by terrorists: (i) adapt their operating methods, (ii) evade detection, (iii) further attack the U.S., its allies or their citizens, or (iv) retaliation against the participants of the secret trial.

White House officials have stated that military courts let the government try, suspected terrorists quickly, efficiently and without endangering public security, classified information or intelligence and methodsOperations. They argue that courts would American jurors, judges and witnesses of the possible dangers of the defendants tried to protect Terroristen. According to some government officials, the government is trying reluctantly captured terrorists - especially leaders of the Taliban and al-Qaida terrorist network - conventional courts, which take their trials and appeals for years, and was left in the glasses.

Specifically, proponents of secret evidence argue that the withholding taxClassified by the accused is necessary because disclosure would jeopardize intelligence-gathering system efforts in the area and dry up valuable information. For example, the accused can experience the highly sensitive and actionable information that he or his attorney may then easily spread to others. Such a scenario is especially dangerous if the accused is a member of a global terrorist network like al-Qaida. Critics of secret evidence, argue on the other side,that classified evidence not disclosed to the basic principles of due process, cripples the ability of lawyers to open an effective defense, and the door to racial and religious prejudice.

Security needs

The government argues that it can offer during the current fighting, secret proceedings and trial more security and protection for all involved.

Many fear that the freedom of the press access to national security concerns compromise. Concerns about a media frenzy around terroristischeStudies and projections that members of al-Qaida terrorist network may be glorified or made into martyrs if they are on public trial all have to be addressed on a case by case basis, not closure orders through the ceiling.

If one concludes that any court will be used to suspected terrorists, will try an additional target for terrorists, then the added security of a U.S. military installation with (i) sophisticated security measures, (ii) limited access, and ( iii isolated) from civilianMetropolitan areas is to keep the rational place to such a procedure. The U.S. government has found that post-trial Taliban, Al Qaeda or terrorist retaliation is a real threat are so secret, is responsible for the proceedings to protect the identity of the participants justice.

Classified Nature of Evidence

Since in the context of the evidence submitted, a U.S. military commission is likely to be better evidence of involvement to protect ongoing military operations and investigations, whichostensibly to continued success of military operations required. The type of classified / sensitive information, it is argued, must be kept secret "includes communications U.S. intelligence sources, identities, skills and methods to collect." Furthermore, because U.S. military are trained panelists Commission already in the maintenance of confidentiality, and have experienced background security investigation, they will process to effectively be able to classified information.

Maintain the secrecyour allies' Information

The U.S. argues that its secret information is also derived from allied intelligence sources. This information was disseminated through public trial, the cooperation with the United States may exercise its allies to "lose vital" information.

Rules of Evidence

Because the evidence is against terrorist fighters argued by the United States have their basis in the areas of combat "active," the submission of such proof will be better served by U.S. militaryCommission rules of evidence because they are run by less flexible and forced formality. The basis for the application of this standard of evidence refers to the manner in which it has received, is maintained and protected in the ongoing military operations, including the recognition of the alleged war-related chaos in terms of demand.

Procedures after conviction

A conviction and sentence become final only after the U.S. President or his deputy, the U.S.Secretary of Defense. The U.S. president and U.S. Secretary of Defense is allowed at the discretion of parole gewähren or reject or modify findings of a guilty verdict for a guilty verdict to a lesser included offense, or reduce, move, commute, or suspend the sentence or a part thereof. "

Foreign Policy and Secret Trials

started as the leader in the transparency of governments, the United States' reputation and leadership by his secret methodPolicy.

Secret Trials Harm the United States' reputation

The United States should consider that their reputation mottled already losing ground as a world leader to take. On the one hand, U.S. allies seek in the United States with the implementation of widely accepted international law. In addition, friendly nations share common legal traditions and the past with the United States. On the other hand, non-allied nations exploit the United States' use of secret methods and processes todenigrate the United States for violations of international law. In addition, such a procedure allows the U.S. enemies on American precedent as a reason for their own injuries and atrocities benefit justified.

U.S. Hypocrisy

In addition, try to military commissions, the crime of terrorism, sending at least two inappropriate messages: (a) the only superpower in the world, should promote the rule of law, can with proper protection for foreign nationals without (if they have at leastremain outside the U.S.) and (b) It is reasonable to do the same for other countries. The former message is not only problematic in and of itself, but it undermines any moral superiority. For example, it seems hypocritical to use the United States on these military commissions, and then criticize other countries like China, for their lack of due process protection.

In addition, a U.S. Department of State official right tone for the secret procedures set controversy,"Secret trials [are] not with due process." On 25 March this year, for example, condemns State Department Spokesman Margaret Tutwiler D. Israel's deportation of four Palestinians to claim that the United States "believes that the charges for misconduct be brought along to be argued in a court based on evidence, public process. "In addition, for his part, condemned the government of the United States or critical of the successive governments on the use of secret trials: Nigeria;Egypt, Peru, China, Syria, Cuba, Iraq and Kuwait.

The use of military contracts to foreign nationals in situations of traditional short war also try problematic precedent that could be used by other countries to (a) crack down on dissidents, the attempt to domestic violence, or (b) U.S. soldiers arrested perpetrate abroad during a peace mission or humanitarian intervention.

Critics also argue that secret tests are bad public relations for the United Statesbecause the outcome of such a procedure is achieved e njoy none of the legitimacy of the results in normal civilian trials.33 More, and not stigmatized as terrorists, as defendants can be regarded as political prisoners - victims, not perpetrators. Some European countries, including Spain, have made it clear that they do not extradite suspects to the United States when a guarantee that the defendant not before a military court because of what they think havetheir suspicions procedures. As such, opponents argue that the United States is "a threat credibility as a world leader.

To the extent that appear studies are less than legitimate, the appearance of a "victor's justice" justice "or what some characterize perhaps as" anti-Muslim justice "is strengthened. Such a phenomenon could turn the administration's efforts to undermine a coalition against for terrorism, and possibly additional incite terrorism. Many European countries have alreadyexpressed concern about the use of military commissions. If U.S. allies are concerned about military commissions, the perception is already hostile to the United States undoubtedly worse.

Problem of legitimacy can also impact on the trials themselves. For example, Spain, first took the position that it does not extradite eight men with complicity in the attacks of 11 September levied if the United States agreed, in order to try in a civilian court. If countries areunwilling to extradite suspects, they can not also be willing to assist in the procurement of key witnesses and evidence. As a result, the United States could implement the ability to actual studies are hampered.

Thus, even if (a) military trials are conducted under prescribed well-planned, fairly neutral regulations by the Secretary of Defense, (b) defendants are represented by the position of the defenders, and (c) The proof is solid, it would be extremely difficult to counter assertions that the procedurewere illegitimate, especially if any of the proceedings closed to the public.

Pernicious aspects of the U.S. mission consent to the use of Military Commissions

A particularly harmful aspect of the current activities against Al-Qaeda terrorists - from the perspective of the fanatical (and not so fanatical) Muslims - is that the United States are anxious to denigrate the religious integrity and personal character of a quarter of our population.
The tragedy of 11September both opportunities and dangers for the United States. A finely calibrated and thoughtful foreign policy towards the Muslim world can have a transformative global impact. It can secure not only the United States, but also prompt the Muslim world towards greater democracy, peace and an important member of the international community. A skin rash and insensitive foreign policy will only increase uncertainty and lead to a prolonged and bloody conflict, is underminedto undermine the world economy and global stability.

Since so much of the U.S. government action in a culturally insulting manner is established, the case against religious militants set directed to go against their personal dignity at the end (and forever). As such, the resulting secret trials and convictions tainted by inherent political inequality. In this sense, for the United States' attempt at a corruption free society and as a world leader in human rights, our core businessfundamental judicial history is less near the meaning. In the case of Al-Qaeda fighters, human rights means to take into account personal and religious integrity that must be taken as the primary problem of how the world looks to the United States as a market leader.

National security and confidentiality not to the cultural and religious issues in mandating Military Commissions address

From the perspective of the fanatical (and not so fanatical) Muslims are ready, the United States to discredit the religiousIntegrity and personal character of a quarter of our population. Since so much of the U.S. government's approach has been calculated at an insult to the citizens in a world of religious and cultural exchange, the United States loses its focus in the fight against terrorism. The worst mistake that the current struggle against terrorism is not necessary, the simple rules in order to foreigners in a culturally and religiously more relativistic way.

As such, the argument that nationalSecurity mandates secrecy not for the fact that the United States is not a war against a quantifiable unit of account. It is not. The United States is fighting an amorphous nature. Religion and culture - that is a mistake that the United States was in the past by an unruly and ill-advised, committed in the Vietnam conflict. Secrecy in the fight against a quantifiable unit can win the day, because hanging the effectiveness and success of the military attacks do be surprised if aEnemy fails to change his tactics against or take precautions. An amorphous enemy of culture and religion is a new and not so new opponent.

The religious fighters has no weaknesses, because his fanatical warfare strategy changes to meet needs. The United States is vulnerable at all times against this threat, public knowledge will be used by information to the workers of a religious crusade convict is meaningless, the security of the United States. The reality must be that, so that public awarenessThis secret method is likely to highlight in a negative way, the huge gap between combatants and religious crusader, and the current government can not afford the perception that in the end, it is the pursuit of these people for their religious beliefs.

CONCLUSION - Reformation

Open courtrooms must be embraced by the citizens for the desired element of the democracy of free debate on law and its application. Public hearings and sentencing to preserve confidence in the rule ofLaw.

Even if the secret hearings are conducted fairly, they are "inherently suspect." Accordingly, the U.S. must reconsider their secret methods and processes of the practice. In fact, the U.S. decision to embrace the secret experiments in contradiction to their own courts of public history.

The U.S. "public trials, and tradition is in response to forfeit the barbaric justice examples that certainly the Spanish example of the Spanish Inquisition, the French abuse of the lettre decachet, and the English Court of Star Chamber.

Moreover, contrary to and un-reviewed secret court proceedings international human rights standards adopted laws to provide transparency of government decision-making mandate. Under normal circumstances, the rights of a foreign citizen by the process can not be extinguished so easily. But if the United States remains the "undisputed actions, international citizens will continue without recourse or acceptable attention should be sentenced to a fair trial. So ifAccount of the attack on due process rights and the risk of corruption and error "to the public and the media must be authorized to review all the" facts "that are the subject of an individual, huge amounts of criminal responsibility."

Of course, a secret procedures and processes in conflict with the policies of our democratic values. This practice undermines our democratic processes.

Embracing secret studies conflict with international humanitarian laws and laws of the United StatesRespect to a minimal due process requirements of a proper adjudicative process and the deference to fact-finder. Even this practice does not fall within a recognized exception to the secrecy, including: (i) the national security, (ii) privacy, or (iii) confidentiality. Moreover, contrary to the practice adopted in international humanitarian law, the law enforcement to ensure transparency.

The secret process currently employed by the U.S. promotes a reduction of public confidence in ourJustice. These procedures represent a threat to freedom and they are contrary to democratic values and democratic processes to form the basis of the American way of life. As such, the U.S. should reverse its policy in which the use of secret trials and procedural transparency, in line with the basic fundamental human rights to embrace, international humanitarian law and due process.

In the long term, the promotion of democracy, political self-determination and human rightsRights should be the overriding goal to be for the U.S. cooperation with the Muslim world. Washington should not support authoritarian regimes that undermine democracy and systematically violate the human rights of its own citizens. In addition, Washington should a program to promote intercultural understanding. Western allies should not only be invited to participate in this global program, but also share the financial burden of the project. American and European Muslims can become a veryimportant bridge between the two worlds and their participation should be active. The goal here is to address the growing anti-Americanism in the Muslim world arrest and to reduce prejudice and hostility towards Islam in the United States.

Even when I make these suggestions, I realize that it is a naive wish a hard-core liberal Muslim sound. So be it. Unless we work to build a relationship that is premised on mutual respect and understanding and accommodatingInterests, we will be condemned to war. Above all, the events of 11 September showed that the United States may be violated at a time when it is the only one, dominant, and undisputed superpower. We live in an increasingly interdependent world, and in this world, our insecurities and interdependent. If other feel secure, we will not be safe. If we want to protect our security, we need to work with others to make them safer. In its security is our security. This is the only solution tothe security dilemma.

The basic idea, a policy that can support as "nice, but together is tough." In an interesting computer game theoretical experiment showed Robert Axelrod (in Evolution of Cooperation), that in the long term, international actors, the first stage was nice and subsequent ones tough (use a tit-for-tat strategy), the most frequently around the The policy of the Flight Safety dilemma.5 "nice but tough", I recommend not only the rationalSense, but will also stand up to a systematic scientific investigation. I also recognize that changes in Washington will not be enough to transform the fundamental nature of the relationship between the U.S. and the Muslim world. But the framework I suggest is certainly the anti-Americanism and the security of the United States and its image in the eyes of Muslims everywhere. If you need more information, you can contact a well qualified lawyer in Los Angeles that youmore fully understand the intricacies of the secret trials. You can Dallas criminal lawyers who require well-versed in the area of secret trials and public criminal trials experienced.

Tags : caraudiomonitor. hdtv settlement debt relief subway franchise mesothelioma law firm

Birmingham Police Department Beats Anthony Warren While Unconscious

Would "injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere" - Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. You think that would have Birmingham Police Department learned after all these years ... but they have not. A police chase started 23rd January 2008, Anthony Warren was "a man who never identified himself as an officer confronted, was not in uniform and went to him in an unmarked car," his current lawyer, Wendy put crew. Mr. Warren led the police on a pursuit of 22 minutes, almost hitting a vacuum cleaner,Alabama police officers. The chase ended when police made a PIT maneuver, pushed Mr. Warren's van and caused it to overturn several times. Mr. Warren was thrown from the van with his driver's side window and was lying unconscious on the floor. In the video you can clearly see, Mr. Warren thrown out the window and apparently unconscious, but this does not stop Birmingham's Finest from teaching him a lesson. Five officers rushed up to him and beat him with their fists and batons and kickinghim while he lay motionless on the ground. As if this was not horrible enough, the video never before Mr. Warren's lawyer, preparing for his trial known, the actual Police Chase Video called a year later. Mr. Warren and his lawyer had no idea that he had been beaten and thought that was his extensive injuries due to the van crash - the video evidence to the contrary. Mr. Warren is currently serving 20 years in prison for the attack on the Hoover PD officer that he almost hit. Note,...



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZvejYFF9Ua4&hl=en

My Links : monitor body skin care child franchise consolidate student loan

childcare supervisor abusing children at lorain county juvenile detention july 30 2009

An investigation was whether a Lorain County Juvenile Detention Home workers used excessive force when he hit a 16-year-old inmate in a table last week, forwarded to the city prosecutors to take account of costs. Lorain County Sheriff's Capt. James Drozdowski said Childcare Supervisor James Catalano offense was criminal assault or assault charges for the incident that was captured on surveillance cameras in his face detention homes. If you watch the video, it looks like the detentionHome workers have a little overzealous, "said Drozdowski. The incident occurred around 2.30 clock Friday after detention home worker broke a fight between other inmates at the facility in a common area. After the battle of the prisoners, including the 16-year-old, was told that the wall. In the video, which also does audio, Catalano walks on the boy and starts to seize him. The video then shows the boy Catalano slamming into a table, before he and other detention home workers take theBoys from the room. The boy was later to EMH Regional Medical Center, where he made 15 stitches on his chin, his lawyer, James Barilla. Catalano, who was suspended with pay after the incident, said sheriff's deputies that the boy was aggressive towards him. His comment was the juvenile court made an aggressive move against him, and he did what he to do to protect him and had to restrict themselves, "said Drozdowski. The boy was in custody after home instead of in the amount of...



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dtlV8ea7Uw4&hl=en

Friends Link : headrest projection hdtv princess cruise ships asbestos attorney asbestos settlement

Bert Agrela's Lawyer Conference Call - 1 of 7 [EPISODE1]

This is a lawyer participation Recorded Live Conference 1 May 2009. Agrela Bert is the man whose wife was raped by a Federal Agent. He was attacked and hospitalized for reporting rape of his wife to the local FBI office SF. He sued the FBI for $ 100 million ready and looking for a lawyer to take the case on a contingency basis. The attacker [a coward with a history of rape of innocent women allowed here in the Bay Area] are debt and the FBI withheld evidence of Congress. ALLSenate Judiciary MEMBERS witnessed the rape and SURVEILLANCE ASSAULT footage. BOTH the House and Senate judiciary BEEN informed that BERT AN INDEPENDENT wants special prosecutor and the death penalty.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qPnW2Ql4UMA&hl=en

Friends Link : domainname car monitor franchise association car insurance comparisons optus prepaid